CLINICAL CASE: Precise and confident treatment of a complex root fracture by Dr. Giuliano Fragola

A complex premolar root fracture case using the new CS 8200 3D Neo Edition

Patient Situation
A 45-year-old female patient presented with pain in the first quadrant and the sensation of slight mobility when she chewed. Her overall health was good; she was a non-smoker, with good oral hygiene. Her dental history revealed that she had undergone endodontic treatment about 15 years previously, and she had a full contour crown in place, which was causing no issues.

In trying to identify the source of the pain, extensive visual inspection and percussions were carried out, but these alone were not enough to diagnose the source of the pain. A CBCT scan was therefore indicated to assess potential subgingival or bone complications.

Clinical Case Fig 1.jpg

Fig. 1 - Axial view of the maxilla, showing a root fracture of tooth 14 (red arrow)

Clinical Case Fig 2.jpg

Fig. 2 - Sagittal view showing a root fracture of tooth 14, the bone loss associated (red arrow) and an apical lesion

Diagnosis and Treatment
The new CS 8200 3D Neo Edition from Carestream Dental was used to take the image, with the CS MAR tool (Metal Artefact Reduction) delivering precise and very clear images for diagnosis and treatment planning. It can be very difficult to see a root fracture of this nature due to reflections from existing crowns, which are typically placed over endodontically-treated teeth, but this technology overcomes this problem.

“Having used digital technologies from Carestream Dental since the late 1990s, I completely trust the quality of the equipment available.”

Clinical Case Fig 3.PNG
Fig. 3 - 3D rendering showing the vertical root fracture on the vestibular side of tooth 14 (red arrow)

The images demonstrated bone loss around the sites of the 14 and 16 (Fig 1 and 2), which explained the mobility and positive percussion. Using different 3D views obtained from the CS 8200, complex root fracture was diagnosed in the first premolar (14) (Fig. 3), along with complete bone loss between the roots of the first maxillary molar (16) and a small sinus floor bone perforation (Fig. 4 and 5).

This provides a very useful tool for the clinician, facilitating communication with the patient and encouraging them to engage with treatment from the very beginning. With a CS 8200 3D image, it was easy for the patient to visually see the problem and understand the proposed treatment so she felt confident to accept the recommended treatment and proceed straightaway.

There was only one viable treatment option available in this case: 14 and 16 both had a hopeless prognosis and so would require extraction and restoration. The procedure was explained to the patient in full, including benefits, limitations and potential risks to ensure informed consent to proceed.

Clinical Case Fig 4-5.pngFigs. 4-5 - Coronal and sagittal views of tooth 16, showing the dentine and bone resorption on the palatal root and the sinus floor perforation

Both teeth were extracted as atraumatically as possible and then left to heal for approximately six months, when dental implants would be placed. The patient declined a removable denture option, preferring restoration. Given the complexity of this case, a new CBCT scan was indicated post hard and soft tissue healing to assess bone volume remaining for implant placement planning.

Patient Outcome
The patient was very satisfied with the outcome of treatment, appreciating the quick and precise diagnosis and treatment delivery based on the information obtained.

“I’m absolutely impressed by the images shown by the dentist with the fracture lines. I completely understand that extraction is the only option.” -Patient Response

At this stage, we are waiting for the soft and hard tissue to fully heal before deciding how to proceed. A new CBCT scan using low dose mode may be indicated post healing to analyse the bone volume and density, and to support the planning procedure for implant placement and restoration. This scan would be used to help determine whether bone grafting will be required and if it can be delivered simultaneously with implant placement. Even with the second CBCT scan, the patient would still be exposed to less radiation in the long-term compared to the alternative—multiple periapical X-rays at different angles.

Results
From a professional perspective, good results were achieved in this case. The new CBCT scanner was instrumental in ensuring accuracy and confidence of every stage in the treatment, from diagnosis to treatment planning and delivery. It was also beneficial in supporting and improving communication with the patient, enhancing their understanding of the procedure and ensuring quick but confident informed consent. The CS 8200 3D Neo Edition helps to obtain precise and high-quality images. Being able to select the FOV with a simple and quick view shot, and to manage the scattering with digital formatting are further benefits.

About the Author
Dr. Fragola is a renowned dental surgeon, International Team for Implantology (ITI) Fellow and international speaker. He utilises his skills and experience by working as an ITI Academy reviewer, a KOL for various dental organisations and manages his own private practice in Madrid, Spain.

Contact Us
Complete the form below to request more information about Carestream Dental's portfolio of products and how they can help your practice.


Contributors
By Dr. Giuliano Fragola DDS, MS, PhD Madrid Complutense University 1995 MSc in implant dentistry 1996
Share